SBANC Newsletter

August 21, 2007

Issue 484-2007

QUOTE

"At the end of the day, anybody who thinks there's a reward for nothing, ends up losing."

     -- Kerry Stokes

FEATURE PAPER

The Dynamics of Conflict Management in West Africa: The Case of Violent Conflicts among the Tiv People of the Middle Belt of Nigeria

The following paper was presented at the 2007 Allied Academies International Conference - Jacksonville. It was written by Justice A. P. B. Utsaha of Benue State Customary Court of Appeal, Nigeria
Steve D. Ugbah of California State University, and Stevina U. Evuleocha of California State University.

Abstract

In the last few decades Nigeria has experienced violent conflicts and antagonism rooted in religion, ethnicity, and economics. Violent conflicts among the Tiv people of the Middle Belt region
of Nigeria are not an exception. This paper (1) examines the environmental context and dynamics of intra-Tiv conflicts; (2) examines the causes of conflict more broadly and in Tivland specifically; (3) offers preventive diplomacy (PD) grounded in Tiv tradition and culture, as a strategy for conflict management among the Tiv; and (4) discusses policy implications for resolving conflicts and sustaining peace in Tivland.

Introduction

The African continent has been, and continues to be, embroiled in one conflict after another. Over the last 40 years nearly 20 African countries, or about 40% of Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), have
experienced at least one period of civil war (Elbadawi & Sambanis, 2000). Elbadawi & Sambanis estimate that 20 percent of SSA's population now live in countries which are formally at war, and
low-intensity conflict has become endemic to many other African states. This state of affairs has created stereotypes of Africa as a doomed continent with inescapable ethnic cleavages and violent
tribal conflicts. As the most populated African nation with over 140 million people, Nigeria has not been spared its share of violent conflicts, particularly ethnic conflicts. Some of these ethnic/communal conflicts have been characterized as crises of identity (Isa, 2001) or competition for control of the political space (Egwu, 1998). These pose a fundamental threat and challenge to
the state, and erode current attempts at institutionalizing virile and durable democracies in Africa, and particularly in Nigeria.

Since conflict prevention has not taken sufficient root in Nigeria, ethnic conflicts have now become pervasive. As Isa aptly notes “Ethnic conflicts in Nigeria have attained a situation of
pervasive phenomenon; it has turned Nigeria's urban and rural communities into battlefields and killing grounds” (p. 1). The sheer number of recent inter-ethnic/communal clashes compels us to
refocus our efforts at attempting to understand the causes of violent inter-ethnic/communal conflicts, and ways of preventing them. The Ife-Modakeke communal conflicts of Oyo/Osun States, 1999;
Hausa/Fulani and Kataf of Zangon Kataf in Kaduna State, 1999; Ijaw and Istekiris of Warri in Delta State, 1999; Hausa/Fulani and Yoruba ethnic conflicts in Oyo and Lagos States respectively,
1999/2000; Jukun/Chamba and Kuteb, Jukun and Tiv in Taraba State, 1998/1999; Igbakwu-Omor, Aguleri and Umuleri communal conflicts of Anambra State, 1999 (Isa, 2001) are manifestations of
these conflicts. In Tivland, some of the most prominent conflicts include the following: The 1947 chieftaincy riots in Makurdi, Ushongo-Iharev, Isherev-Utyondu, Tiv-Jukun, Tiv-Udam, Inyambuan,Shoja Patali, Atemtyo, and the militia. Currently there are low-grade conflicts within Tivland that have not received any media attention.

Two key questions with profound policy implications could be asked: (1) What explains the high incidence of intra-Tiv conflicts? (2) What strategies can be used to reduce the incidence of
intra-Tiv conflicts and sustain peace in Tivland?

Read the Entire Paper...

.

TIP OF THE WEEK

Ownership and Succession of Family Business

One of the most important - and potentially controversial - elements of a family-owned business is the number of owners in the enterprise.

Having multiple family owners can affect overall business performance and add to the complexity of the professional and personal dynamics within the firm. These dynamics can, in turn, have broad implications on company direction, retirement decisions, succession planning, and ultimately, the future viability of the business itself.

Nearly three quarters of all respondents in our 2007 survey indicate that their company has five or fewer owners. Another 17 percent reported having between five and nine owners. Thus for 91 percent of the family-owned businesses in this country, the ownership structure is fairly simple - with fewer than 10 individuals involved. Likewise, over 90 percent of the ownership in these firms is controlled by family members.

The relatively simple structure of the firms contribute to the lack of formal succession planning for the next generation, which could lead to potential crisis in the future. Despite the fact that nearly 60 percent of the majority shareholders of family-owned firms are 55 or older, only 29 percent of the firms have a written succession plan. Further, only 46 percent say that their firm has plans outlining potential management roles for their heirs, and even fewer - 41 percent - have identified a successor. When a successor has been named, nearly 90 percent of respondents indicate that the new leader will be a family member.

At the same time, over 67 percent of respondents believe that their current CEO will not leave their company any time soon - that is, the CEO will retire at least five years into the future. Given the age of majority shareholders in our survey, this expectation may be unrealistic. Sooner or later, most people want to retire. For family-owned business, having a written succession plan in place can mean the difference between a multigenerational company and one that is forced to either liquidate or sell upon retirement of the majority shareholder. Perhaps this is why more than 50 percent of family-owned businesses fail to last beyond one generation.

Succession can be further complicated if the older generation has ceased active involvement without yielding positions of authority, or if they have not decided how to remain involved after leaving active management. Fortunately, most family businesses report that older family members are responsive to the needs of the firm and have made plans for how they want to be involved after giving up active management roles. Further, more than 80 percent of respondents say the generation wants the business to stay in the family; 76 percent claim that that the next generation is committed to retaining ownership in the firm; and 75 percent feel the next generation has the business competence and acumen required to run their company.

When is the appropriate time to begin talking to the next generation about the business and their potential future involvement in the firm? Responses vary considerably. The most frequent age cited for these types of discussions is 18 to 25, when young adults are attending or nearing completion of college and considering potential career paths. After that, the age ranges for such discussions to occur are fairly evenly dispersed among 12 years of age and under, 13 to 17, and 26 or older.

The importance of a business in a family's livelihood is undisputed, with over 92 percent of respondents indicating that their family-owned firm provides the primary source of income and security. Likewise, there is a strong consensus among respondents about compensation issues. Over 60 percent of survey respondents say that information about family member compensation is shared among other family members and 81 percent of respondents indicate that family members are paid at fair market value.

Laird Norton Tyee Family Business Survey 2007 - Family to Family 2007. pg.12-13.

 

ANNOUNCEMENTS

Social Entrepreneurship Survey

If you are interested in participating in a survey on how social entrepreneurship is taught, reflections on the field and the implications for teaching, click here. This link was not working properly in the last newsletter so please take the time to complete this survey. SBANC is sorry for the inconvience.

Request for Papers & Reviewer Volunteers

The Small Business Institue is now requesting papers and paper review volunteers for the Small Business Institute Journal. If you are interested in submitting a paper or becoming a volunteer, please let us know. The first issue is to be printed April 2008. For more information please click here or email us at sbij@uca.edu.

SBANC is Updating Their Entrepreneurship and Small Business Network

The Small Business Advancement National Center is currently updating their Entrepreneurship and Small Business Network. If you currently teach or know a professor in your school or state that teaches an Entrepreneurship or Small Business course, please provide us with any available information at sbanc@uca.edu. We appreciate any help. Thank you.

.

CONFERENCES

MMA
Who:
Marketing Management Association
What:

MMA Fall Educators Conference

Where:  St. Louis, Missouri, USA
When: September 26-28, 2007

BOP 2007
Who: The William Davidson Institute and the Center for Sustainable Global Enterprise at Cornell University
What:

Base of the Pyramid Conference 2007

Where:  Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
When: September 9-11, 2007

FU
Who:
Fordham University
What:

The Fordham University Pricing Conference

Where:  Fordham University, New York, New York, USA
When: September 28-29, 2007

ISBE
Who:
Institute for Small Business and Entrepreneurship
What:

30th Annual ISBE Conference

Where:  Heriot-Watt University, Glasgow, Scotland
When: November 7-9, 2007

E-nnovations
Who:
E-nnovations
What:

E-nnovations 2007: Mid-Atlantic Entrepreneurship Conference

Where:  Anne Arundel Community College - Arnold, Maryland, USA
When: October 13, 2007


CALLS FOR PAPERS


BRC
Who:
The Business Review, Cambridge
What:

N/A

Where: Cambridge
When: N/A

Submission Deadline:
September 7, 2007

 

IBEC
Who:
International Business and Economy Conference
What:

Seventh International Business and Economy Conference

Where: San Francisco, California, USA
When: January 9 - 12, 2008

Submission Deadline:
September 7, 2007

 

SWAM
Who:
Southwest Academy of Management
What:

2008 Annual Meeting and 50th Reunion Southwest Acadmeny of Management

Where:  Hyatt Regency - Houston, TX
When: March 4-8, 2008

Submission Deadline:
September 17, 2007

 

SBI
Who:
Small Business Institute
What:

2008 SBI Conference

Where:  Handlery Hotel – San Diego, CA
When: Feb. 14-16, 2008

Submission Deadline:
October 1, 2007




 

The SBANC Newsletter is provided as a service to the members of our affiliates: Academy of Collegiate Marketing Educators (ACME), Association for Small Business & Entrepreneurship (ASBE), Federation of Business Disciplines (FBD), International Council for Small Business (ICSB), Institute for Supply Management (ISM), The International Small Business Congress (ISBC), Marketing Management Association (MMA), Small Business Administration (SBA), Service Corps of Retired Executives (SCORE), Small Business Institute (SBI), Society for Marketing Advances (SMA), United States Association for Small Business & Entrepreneurship (USASBE), U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).. If you are interested in membership or would like further information on one of our affiliates, please see our web site at http://www.sbaer.uca.edu

 

SBANC STAFF

Main Office Phone: (501) 450-5300

Dr. Don B. Bradley III, Executive Director of SBANC & Professor of Marketing;

Direct Phone: (501) 450-5345

Brandon Tabor, Development Intern

Kitty Dockins, Development Intern

Latedra Williams, Development Intern

 

 

To subscribe or unsubscribe to the SBANC Newsletter, please E-mail SBANC at sbanc@uca.edu

Small Business Advancement National Center - University of Central Arkansas
College of Business Administration - UCA Box 5018 201 Donaghey Avenue
Conway, AR 72035-0001
- Phone (501) 450-5300 - FAX (501) 450-5360